Prince Jackson has hit back at paternity critics on Twitter, whilst
hinting that Michael Jackson may not be his biological father.
The 18-year old felt inclined to address the rumours when he saw (yet
another) tweet claiming that he wasn't "a Jackson".
Even though the tweet doesn't explicitly deny that Michael was his
biological father, it suggests that they might not be blood related.
Prince and his siblings, Paris and Blanket, have been subjected to
rumours surrounding their parentage ever since they were born – more
specifically that Dr. Arnold W. Klein was the one who fathered the
children with Michael's ex-wife Debbie Rowe.
The Beverley Hills Dermatologist, now 70-years old, only added fuel to
the fire back in January 2013 when he posted an old driver's license
alongside a photo of Prince and cryptically captioned it: 'Hmmmm.'
Hmmmm, indeed.
One of the late singer's friends, Jason Pfeiffer, has also previously
claimed that both Prince and Paris were not Michael's biological
children.
In an interview with The Mirror he said: "One day as we talked about
his children and Debbie Rowe, he just came out and said that his
children were actually fathered by [British actor] Mark [Lester]."
"Michael calmly said, 'My friend Mark donated the sperm'. I was taken
aback, but I didn't think to ask anymore questions about the
procedure. He looked proud as he delivered the news."
Arnold? Mark? Debbie?
Whoever was responsible for the Jackson trio's upbringing, Prince is
insistent that Michael was the only father he had ever known – and
that's good enough for us!
No comments:
Post a Comment