short of apologising for a controversial experiment it conducted this
year.
In June, the site was criticised for manipulating the news feeds of
nearly 700,000 users without their consent.
The network said it was "unprepared" for the backlash it received.
"[We] have taken to heart the comments and criticism. It is clear now
that there are things we should have done differently," Facebook said.
In a blog, chief technology officer Mike Schroepfer said the company
should have "considered other non-experimental ways to do this
research".
He added: "In releasing the study, we failed to communicate clearly
why and how we did it."
The social network controlled the news feed of users over a one-week
period in 2012 without their knowledge to manage which emotional
expressions they were exposed to.
The experiment was part of a study by Facebook and two US
universities. The social network said at the time it was to gauge
whether "exposure to emotions led people to change their own posting
behaviours".
However, the company was widely criticised for manipulating material
from people's personal lives in order to play with user emotions or
make them sad.
In response on Thursday, Facebook said that it was introducing new
rules for conducting research on users with clearer guidelines, better
training for researchers and a stricter review process.
But, it did not state whether or not it would notify users - or seek
their consent - before starting a study.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) in London, which supports
data privacy for individuals, said Facebook's comments were "a step in
the right direction", but it hoped to hear more about how the social
network intends to improve transparency.
"Organisations who want to process people's personal information
without explicitly asking for their permission, for instance to carry
out research, always need to proceed with caution," an ICO spokesman
said.
IDC research analyst Jan van Vonno said it was Facebook's
responsibility to notify users of any studies they were partaking in.
"They're going to continue that research and what they should do is
make users aware of what they're doing and that's not really what
they're doing right now," Mr van Vonno said.
An apology would be a sign of regret and they obviously don't regret
any of their actions because they think it's for the benefit of their
own platform."
It was still important for Facebook to study consumer behaviour so it
could maximize the impact advertisers had on the platform, which
remains a huge source of revenue for the company, Mr van Vonno added.
The company's mobile advertising revenue jumped 151% in the second
quarter of this year from 2013 and accounted for more than 60% of its
overall ad revenue.
Just this week, Facebook relaunched Atlas, an advertising platform it
bought from Microsoft last year, to improve the effectiveness of its
ads.
No comments:
Post a Comment